Webinar

SCA (software composition analysis) is the process of identifying all third‑party and open source components in your application and evaluating their licenses, security vulnerabilities, and operational risks. It helps you understand exactly what’s in your codebase, including transitive dependencies pulled in via modern package managers. By doing this, you can proactively manage legal and security exposure before release, rather than reactively scrambling when an issue is discovered. For software producers, SCA is now a foundational practice for building secure, compliant products at scale and demonstrating due diligence to customers and regulators.

A Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) is like an ingredient label for your software that lists all the components, versions, and their relationships within an application. It covers not only open source but also third‑party commercial components and externally developed code that you ship or host. SBOMs are becoming mandatory in many regulated industries and government contracts, because they give downstream customers and partners transparency into their software supply chain. With a high‑quality SBOM, software producers can respond faster to new vulnerabilities, satisfy audit and regulatory requests, and build trust with buyers who demand visibility.

Open source licenses define what you are allowed to do with a component and what obligations you must meet when you use it in your software. Different license types—such as permissive, copyleft, and network licenses—can impose conditions around modification, linking, distribution, and downstream licensing. If you don’t understand those triggers, you can unintentionally create legal and IP risk for your commercial products. Establishing clear open source policies and having legal review for license categories helps software producers avoid surprises and maintain compliance while still benefiting from open source innovation.

Managing vulnerabilities in open source components starts with visibility into what you’re using and which versions are deployed. SCA tools correlate your SBOM against multiple vulnerability databases and scoring systems like CVSS and EPSS to help you prioritize the most critical issues. Remediation usually focuses on upgrading to safer versions, but it can also include mitigation, suppressing non‑relevant findings, or replacing components if no fix exists. Continuous monitoring is essential, because vulnerability data changes over time, and a safe dependency today may become a high‑risk one tomorrow.

A VEX (Vulnerability Exploitability eXchange) is a machine‑readable document that explains whether known vulnerabilities affecting components in your SBOM are actually exploitable in your specific product. While an SBOM tells you “what’s in the box,” a VEX tells you “which vulnerabilities really matter” based on how the software is built and deployed. It allows software producers to clarify which issues pose real risk and which do not, helping customers and internal teams focus on meaningful remediation. Together, SBOMs and VEX reports significantly reduce noise and make vulnerability management more practical and actionable.

An Open Source Program Office (OSPO) is a cross‑functional group that sets strategy, policies, and processes for consuming and contributing to open source. It typically involves stakeholders from engineering, product, legal, and security, and ensures consistent governance across teams and business units. Companies often establish an OSPO when open source usage becomes widespread, regulatory pressure increases, or customers start demanding stronger supply‑chain assurances. For software producers, an OSPO can accelerate innovation while reducing legal and security risks by making open source management structured, repeatable, and auditable.

Recent regulations in the U.S. and EU are shifting cybersecurity expectations from “best effort” to provable, documented practices. They increasingly require secure development processes, SBOMs, vulnerability management, and in some cases formal attestations signed by company leadership. For software producers, this means you must be able to demonstrate how your software is built, how third‑party code is controlled, and how vulnerabilities are monitored and remediated across the product lifecycle. Adapting early—by integrating SCA, SBOMs, and governance into your DevOps pipelines—helps avoid last‑minute compliance scrambles and protects access to regulated markets and public‑sector opportunities.

In mergers and acquisitions, buyers increasingly demand detailed visibility into open source usage, licensing obligations, and security vulnerabilities in the target’s codebase. Independent SCA‑based audits generate SBOMs and findings that inform risk assessment, potential remediation plans, and even deal pricing. Discovering problematic licenses or unpatched critical vulnerabilities late in the process can delay, devalue, or derail a transaction. By maintaining strong open source compliance practices and up‑to‑date SBOMs, software producers can move more smoothly through due diligence and present a more attractive, lower‑risk profile to potential acquirers or investors.

Shifting left means addressing open source and third‑party risk as early as possible in the development lifecycle instead of waiting until release time. Teams can integrate SCA into developer tools, CI/CD pipelines, and build systems so issues are spotted when dependencies are first added, not months later. Educating developers on licensing basics, security policies, and approved component lists helps them make better choices from the start. This approach reduces rework, avoids last‑minute release delays, and makes compliance and security a natural part of everyday development rather than a separate, disruptive gate.

AI‑assisted development tools can generate code snippets that may resemble or derive from existing open source projects, introducing new IP and licensing questions. From a software producer’s perspective, this code must be treated like any other third‑party contribution and scanned, identified, and reviewed as part of SCA and governance processes. For high‑stakes scenarios such as audits or M&A, more forensic‑level analysis may be needed to understand where certain snippets originated and what obligations they carry. Incorporating AI‑generated code into your standard open source compliance workflow ensures you benefit from productivity gains without taking on hidden legal or security risk.