Webinar

An SBOM (Software Bill of Materials) provides a transparent inventory of all components inside a software product, giving producers and customers greater visibility into what they’re deploying. This visibility is increasingly crucial as cybersecurity expectations and government regulations continue to rise. Software producers can use SBOMs to identify vulnerabilities, license obligations, and areas of operational risk. Ultimately, they help organizations build trust with customers, accelerate compliance, and strengthen security throughout the development lifecycle.

Recent policies, including updates driven by NIST and CISA, are pushing software producers toward more structured and transparent security practices. These guidelines increasingly require agencies and vendors to provide SBOMs to demonstrate compliance and risk reduction. For software producers, staying aligned with these requirements reduces friction in selling to regulated industries. It also prepares them for future mandates as governments prioritize software supply chain security.

An SBOM is a critical foundation, but it does not replace a comprehensive security program. It tells teams what is inside a product, but organizations must still assess vulnerabilities, remediate issues, and apply continuous monitoring. Without processes, policies, and automation in place, an SBOM alone delivers limited value. It becomes truly powerful when integrated into a mature, ongoing security and compliance strategy.

Transparency is increasingly tied to monetization as customers demand proof of security, reliability, and compliance before purchasing software. SBOMs help producers demonstrate due diligence and differentiate themselves in competitive markets. By sharing component insights and license compliance information, producers strengthen credibility and reduce friction in procurement cycles. This leads to smoother sales processes, especially with enterprise and government buyers.

Many teams struggle with inconsistent SBOM formats, incomplete data, or reliance on manual processes like spreadsheets. These challenges can slow adoption and make automation nearly impossible. Organizations also face difficulty integrating SBOM workflows into existing development pipelines. Overcoming these obstacles requires selecting tools and processes that standardize SBOM creation, maintenance, and distribution across the product lifecycle.

A Vulnerability Disclosure Report (VDR) outlines which vulnerabilities affect a product and what producers are doing to address them. A VEX (Vulnerability Exploitability eXchange) clarifies which vulnerabilities are not actually exploitable in a particular context, reducing noise and false positives. When paired with an SBOM, these documents help teams communicate real risk more accurately to customers and internal stakeholders. Together, they provide a clearer, more actionable view of security posture.

While SBOMs provide a snapshot of what’s included in a build, security is constantly evolving as new vulnerabilities emerge. Continuous monitoring helps organizations understand how today’s risk landscape affects yesterday’s components. This approach ensures that producers stay ahead of emerging threats rather than reacting after issues arise. Maintaining ongoing security practices is essential for protecting products, revenue, and customer trust.

SBOMs are most effective when integrated early in the development process rather than generated as a final output. By adopting SBOM‑aware workflows, teams can identify risky or outdated components before they enter the codebase. This reduces rework, accelerates releases, and supports left‑shifted security practices. It also ensures product teams stay aligned with compliance expectations from day one.

SBOMs provide a structured inventory of open source components and their associated licenses. This allows software producers to generate accurate attribution notices and meet license obligations during distribution. When maintained properly, SBOMs prevent compliance oversights that can lead to legal or financial risk. They also give customers confidence that the software they’re using adheres to open source requirements.

Producers should look for tools that support recognized SBOM standards, integrate easily into CI/CD workflows, and offer reliable automation. It’s also important to select solutions that maintain SBOM accuracy across releases rather than relying on manual updates. The best tools extend beyond simple SBOM creation to support vulnerability monitoring, license compliance, and interoperability with other security systems. This ensures SBOMs become an operational asset rather than an administrative burden.